Meta has launched a fresh legal challenge against Britain’s media regulator, marking the latest move in a series of actions by major social media platforms. Critics argue these corporations are increasingly leveraging the court system to stall the implementation of the Online Safety Act. In the latest development, lawyers for Meta have filed an appeal against the regulator’s decision to classify WhatsApp and Instagram under a category requiring additional oversight duties.
These heightened responsibilities for the platform include requirements for greater transparency, expanded user controls, improved safeguards against fraudulent advertisements, and more rigorous documentation of illegal content. This legal maneuvering coincides with ongoing tensions involving US tech giants and the Trump administration regarding the fines and fee structures Ofcom is enforcing under the nation’s digital safety framework.
A primary point of contention involves the cost of Ofcom’s regulatory operations, which are funded by a portion of the fines that companies may face. Violations of the Online Safety Act carry potential penalties of up to 18 million pounds or 10% of a firm’s global revenue, whichever amount is greater. In May, Meta initiated a separate legal challenge in London, contending that Ofcom’s methodology for calculating these charges is fundamentally flawed by its reliance on global revenue figures.
The regulator is also facing litigation from other industry players, including TikTok and X, who are contesting the extent of data disclosure required for monitoring purposes. During a House of Lords committee hearing on Tuesday, Oliver Griffiths, Ofcom’s group director for online safety, noted that the agency is currently “operating in a highly litigious environment.” Griffiths emphasized that while the regulator remains committed to driving change, it faces judicial reviews from a “raft of services,” warning that unnecessary legal risks could hinder their efforts.
A spokesperson for Meta stated that the company, alongside other industry entities like TikTok, Roblox, X, and Quora, is challenging specific aspects of the law’s implementation rather than the legislation itself. The company maintained that this is a standard feature of adopting a new regulatory regime, intended to ensure the rules are applied with consistency, accuracy, and proportionality.
Amid these challenges, Lisa Nandy, the secretary for digital, culture, media and sport, recently affirmed the government’s commitment to ongoing digital regulation. Speaking on the Sky News Electoral Dysfunction podcast, Nandy stated that the government will continue to introduce and update legislation to address the rapid pace of technological change, noting that the state must remain interventionist and responsive to ensure effective oversight. The report also notes that breaches of the Online Safety Act can be punished by fines of up to 10% of qualifying worldwide revenue (QWR) or £18m – whichever is higher. The report also notes that “We absolutely are looking to drive change in the best way we can,” Oliver Griffiths, the Ofcom group director for online safety, told peers hearing evidence about the Online Safety Act. “We have all come to work to make. The report also notes that other legal action is being taken by TikTok and X over how much information the companies need to give Ofcom to carry out its job of monitoring their services.
Comments