The appeal of Roku has long been its exhaustive library of live channels, offering everything from classic sitcoms like Little House on the Prairie to hyper-local news broadcasts. However, the platform recently identified a niche for viewers who prefer an endless, surreal stream of AI-generated imagery over traditional human-led storytelling. It was reported last week that Roku launched the Fairground AI Creator TV channel, the first free, all-AI streaming channel that pulls content from roughly 100 AI creators around the world.
Early reactions to the channel have been overwhelmingly negative. Industry outlets have been particularly harsh, with The Verge comparing the viewing experience to eating from a trough, while Futurism dismissed the output as “bottom-of-the-barrel slop.” In truth, the channel is designed for a specific economic model rather than artistic merit. This is television with vanishingly low production costs. When compared to the tens of millions of dollars required to produce a hit series like Stranger Things, the financial incentive for executives to pivot toward AI is clear. In this landscape you don’t need breakout hits, just enough stoned and curious students at 3am to turn a profit.
That said, I have actually just spent a few hours watching Fairground AI Creator TV, more out of self-hatred than anything else, and it would appear that the early reviews are right. On the positive side, the channel serves as evidence that artificial intelligence has advanced significantly over the last two years. Had this been attempted in 2023, we would have had a 24/7 feed of mutant Will Smith choking down handfuls of writhing spaghetti, and the results would have been nauseating. Generally speaking, what Fairground offers today is technically superior, yet it remains categorically, catastrophically awful.
The channel functions less like a curated network and more like a drifting dreamscape of bad ideas rendered with no regard for scheduling. At one point on Wednesday, a shrill, high-frequency anime segment gave way to a staid German-language short about Nazi bureaucracy. This was followed by a Gladiator ripoff that possessed all the dynamism of an exhibit found at the fourth-best museum on a poorly planned family holiday. Switch on Fairground at any time of day and I’d estimate you are no more than 15 minutes away from seeing a witless, sepia historical drama of some description, full of craggy, burly men glowering at each other, dramatically lit by sunset regardless of which direction they’re facing.
The promise of AI is that it allows limitless story potential, and yet the bulk of it ends up looking like what would happen if your dad lucked himself a job scheduling Sunday afternoons on ITV3. While there are still horrible glitches to navigate—stray mouths that don’t move in time with dialogue, impossible physics, and one instance of a man trudging through snow while his feet made a clip-cloppy hoof noise—these errors are becoming less frequent. The real problem is that you are forced to concentrate on the storytelling ability of the creators, which is consistently inert. It is devoid of weight, life, vision, and wit, leaving the viewer to feel as though they are watching a screensaver or a fridge.
The hope is that Fairground represents the future of entertainment, churning out content for pennies while traditional creatives go hungry. While the technology is moving quickly, it remains a long way from convincingly entertaining an audience. At one point, the channel cut away to a commercial for Roku’s Dr Phil channel, and the sight of an actual flesh-and-blood human acting in an identifiably human way was almost moving. Fairground TV remains a 24/7 channel devoted to low-quality AI content for viewers sick of watching real people move in ways that won’t haunt you, but for now, it serves primarily as a reminder of why human artistry remains essential.
Comments